------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 09:01 ------- Well, the (void) *a; and (void) *b; certainly don't look ok, so the problem is earlier. Sorry.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27115
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:01:09 -0700
------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 09:01 ------- Well, the (void) *a; and (void) *b; certainly don't look ok, so the problem is earlier. Sorry.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27115