------- Comment #12 from mf dot danger at gmail dot com 2006-04-22 01:16
-------
actually, gcc itself says so:
printf (_("\
\nOptions starting with -g, -f, -m, -O, -W, or --param are automatically\n\
passed on to the various sub-processes invoked by %s. In order to pass\n\
other options on to these processes the -W<letter> options must be used.\n\
"), programname);
/* The rest of the options are displayed by invocations of the various
sub-processes. */
}
(taken from 3.4.3 gcc/gcc.c)
Having discovered that, I'm now convinced that it is *NOT* a documentation bug.
*IS* a driver bug, and should be fixed.
--
mf dot danger at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27237
