------- Comment #15 from falk at debian dot org 2006-05-01 20:55 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Subject: Re: goto crossing P.O.D. initialization > > "falk at debian dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I think this is a valid request. While random language extensions aren't > | useful, > | compatibility with C99 is. Maybe somebody else can comment on this... > > You have to be more precise about what you mean by C99 compatibility.
I have trouble seeing what might be unclear about this term. I mean that code that is valid C99 is accepted in C++ unless there is a good reason not to. just like most of C89 is accepted in C++ unless there is a good reason not to. > My take on this goto stuff, if it is not valid C++, it is valid C++. That logically implies that everything valid C++, which might be overdoing it a bit ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27235