------- Comment #8 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-05-24 12:55 ------- Subject: Re: New: bogus 'backslash-newline at end of file' warning
sabre at nondot dot org wrote:- > $ gcc bug.c -Wall -pedantic -fsyntax-only -trigraphs -std=c99 > > yields: > bug.c:2:9: warning: trigraph ??/ converted to \ > bug.c:2:9: warning: backslash-newline at end of file > bug.c:2:1: warning: multi-line comment > bug.c:1: warning: ISO C forbids an empty source file > > A couple of issues. First, the diagnostics are not sorted. The last one > should be issued first. Second, more importantly, the 2nd diagnostic is > incorrect. There is no backslash-newline at the end of the file. The first > and third diagnostics are accurate. The empty source file diagnostic is clearly incorrect, it has text in it 8-) However I think it's quite logical it appear last as that it where it can be discovered. The backslash diagnostic is clearly bogus too. Neil. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27750
