------- Comment #5 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-24 15:09 ------- Subject: Re: Rejected valid specialization of member template
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 09:51 > ------- > The case with A<0>::B() instead of A<0>::B<M>() which was also > rejected was fixed with Mark's patch for PR20173. > > The original testcase with A<0>::B<M>() still fails, though. > > Mark, would you mind having a look at this one, too, as you > were just working in that area? I probably won't get there any time soon, sadly; too many regressions to which I'm already assigned. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14494
