------- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-05-26 15:04 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think GCC 4.2.0 is correct in saying the function call is ambiguous, bar is
> still a template class.
Most definitely, foo<int>::bar is not a template class, and the only
thing the call to f() can match is the '...' argument.
This is a regression post 4.0.x.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.1.0
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-26 15:04:02
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27689
