Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 14:14 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I assume I'm not the only one seeing this build failure:


make[5]: Entering directory 
`/build/gcc/2006-06-15/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/tools'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link /build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/xgcc 
-B/build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ 
-B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem 
/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem 
/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include  -O2 -g -O2    -o gappletviewer 
-L/install/gcc/lib -lgcj gappletviewer-toolwrapper.o
/build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/xgcc -B/build/gcc/2006-06-15/./gcc/ 
-B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ 
-isystem /install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem 
/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 -g -O2 -o gappletviewer 
gappletviewer-toolwrapper.o  -L/install/gcc/lib -lgcj
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcj
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [gappletviewer] Error 1

Thank you Tom.. :-)

:-(

This patch of mine:

2006-06-13  Thomas Fitzsimmons  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * configure: Regenerate.
        * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * configure.ac (--enable-plugin): New option.
        (ac_configure_args): Add --enable-tool-wrappers.
        (ac_configure_args): Add --disable-plugin unless --enable-plugin
        was specified.
        * gcj/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * sources.am (gnu_java_net_source_files): Add
        classpath/gnu/java/net/IndexListParser.java.
        (property_files): Remove
        ...

caused a bootstrap failure on multilib architectures. A clean bootstrap did work for me on my x86 workstation, but I hadn't cleared out $prefix. I have a suspicion that the libjava configury reaches into $prefix during the bootstrap. In the future I'll be sure to clear $prefix before bootstrapping, and I'll also bootstrap on a multilib architecture (x86-64).

Sorry for the inconvenience. For now I've reverted the part of the patch that was causing the failure.

Tom

Reply via email to