------- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-22 21:22 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > __asm__ ("choke_me %0 %1 %2" : "+m" (*p1), "+m" (*p2), "+m" (*p3)); > *p1 = val0; > *p2 = val0; > *p3 = val0; > > Actually I don't think so since the asm is dead code as the stores to *p1, > *p2, > and *p3 are dead by the next couple of statements. Hmm, that's true.
-- amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28140