------- Comment #15 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-06-24 18:10 ------- Hi,
Can someone tell me if anyone is looking into this problem with the hopes of fixing it? I just noticed that despite the posted code demonstrating the problem, and verification on: Pentium Pro, Pentium III, Pentium 4e, Pentium-D, Athlon-64 X2 and Opteron, it is still marked as "new", and no one is assigned to look at it . . . The reason I ask is that I am preparing the next stable release of ATLAS, and I'm getting close to having to make a decision on what compilers I will support. If someone is working feverishly in the background, I will be sure to wait for it, in the hopes that there'll be a fix that will allow me to use gcc 4, which I think will be what most of my users want. If this problem is not being looked into, I should not delay the ATLAS release for it, and just require my users to install gcc 3 in order to get decent performance. I realize you guys are busy, and fp performance is probably not your main concern, so hopefully this message sounds more like a request for info on what is going on, than a bitch about help that I'm getting for free :) Thanks, Clint -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827
