------- Comment #26 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 17:29 ------- Well, I don't like much the limiting of inlining in recursive functions (where it is rather interesting) and I can't convince myself that the second patch is safe (ie the cycle don't have to be in consetuctive entries in the postorder I would say). I will test patch that simply make the array GGC root....
Thanks for looking into this, Honza -- hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882