------- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 20:12 ------- (In reply to comment #4)
> Don't you need a HAVE_GFC_REAL_16 section or is random_r10 used > for random_r16? Oops, I uploaded the wrong patch. Sorry 'bout that. However, I still need to think a bit about what constant to multiply with. What I currently have could also return 1. > > Also, I noticed that you've eliminated the normalize_* calls. > I think may actually be able to remove these functions and > the file that contains them. Correct. I would also have to remove the call to normalize_* from rand.c. Looks like a bit more work to be done. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28452