------- Comment #6 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-07-25 20:02 -------
Grr. I've just noticed richi has just assigned this patch to himself.
I also have a patch that been bootstrapped and has nearly finished
regression testing, that I was just about to post/commit. richi what
does your fix look like?
Mine contains several copies of:
if (!TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS)
break;
! if (outprec < TYPE_PRECISION (long_integer_type_node)
! || (outprec == TYPE_PRECISION (long_integer_type_node)
! && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)))
fn = mathfn_built_in (s_intype, BUILT_IN_LCEIL);
+ else if (outprec == TYPE_PRECISION (long_long_integer_type_node)
+ && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
+ fn = mathfn_built_in (s_intype, BUILT_IN_LLCEIL);
break;
[Serves me right for not assigning this when pinkia asked me to investigate.
I knew there was a good reason I don't normally bother with recent PRs].
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28473
