------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 06:25 ------- Hmm, now it is because the order int the compares are different: 418f01: comiss %xmm0,%xmm1 418f04: seta %al 418f07: comiss %xmm1,%xmm0
see how the first is xmm0, xmm1 While the second is xmm1, xmm0. Can you file a seperate bug with the source to that function (and make sure it compiles on its own) because that is a different bug as far as I can tell? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28691
