------- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 16:18 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Why are you trying to static link java code? It will almost not work for > other > cases. >
We have 7.5X10^6 lines of code in about 800 classes that run fine statically linked. So it does in fact work. As to why, the answer is startup time and code size. We probably should fix this at some point, but until we do, I guess either do not statically link libc or use your work around. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28760
