------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 22:22 -------
The problem lies in resolve.c (resolve_generic_s):1623
....yes, definitely. resolve_generic_f is not so prissy about use association
and has a somewhat different structure. If I were to transport this to
subroutines, the PR would be fixed....
The morning will bring enlightenment.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28873
