------- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 21:39 ------- I expect that indeed, the test case Kenner mentioned as motivation for the call to mark_temp_addr_taken doesn't need it any more because of gimplification. Any temporary that needs to live longer than a single gimple statement will be represented in the gimple. So as he said, we should be able to do away with a lot of the temporary management code.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25505
