------- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 07:31 ------- > > Why not use reg_last->sets? > > > AFAICT, reg_last[0].sets is live at that point.
Sorry, I don't understand your answer. I was suggesting to use reg_last->sets to get the last set of the reg instead of privately re-scanning the RTL. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28618
