On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 17:52 +0000, h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no wrote: > > Also you forgot one thing '%' does not have to match up with the ANSI > > character set so it could be negative in signed char which means char > > (which could default to signed char) would be different. > > No. In a conforming C implementation, the character *which C interprets > as '%'* must have a positive value. Maybe you are thinking of the > opposite case: What its glyph _looks like_ on some display device is out > of scope for the C standard.
But at this point, we are talking about C++ where 'a' is of type char. I have to look at what the C++ standard says about this. -- Pinski
