------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-10-31 11:49 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> ... that said, if we don't care *at all* about performance, fixing MT-safety
> bugs in the _Safe_sequence or _Safe_iterator functions it's easy,...

Of course I meant _Safe_sequence_base and _Safe_iterator_base, humpf.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29496

Reply via email to