------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 23:18 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a duplicate of another PR where we forget to substitute an
> outer template argument in the specialization of an inner template.
> I think it concerned a boolean value in that case, rather than a type.
That is PR 14032.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |14032
Summary|specialization enclosed |partial specialization
|templates within the |enclosed templates within
|declaration of the enclosed |the declaration of the
|class. |enclosed class.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767
