------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 16:34 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > While that can help in this case, I think letting make_tree/expand_expr > > combo > > create invalid RTL is very dangerous (and, at least from i386 backend POV, > > some of the PIC UNSPECs not surrounded by CONST are invalid, the backend > > guarantees that wherever it creates them it adds the CONST around).
Did you read what I wrote, I said it is not valid, the x86 back-end should really be accepting it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825
