------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 17:16 ------- > Fehler: Bei (1) referenziertes Symbol »bar« nicht im Modul »foo« gefunden > > My limited german knowledge seems to indicate that it's OK, but I'm not sure. Looks ok.
> Could you try the attached patch on a few cases (possibly including multiple > loci and such arguments reorganizations)? I will try. It actually effects the following strings in the following languages (see gcc/po/): de.po-msgid "Symbol '%s' referenced at %L not found in module '%s'" de.po-msgid "User operator '%s' referenced at %L not found in module '%s'" de.po-msgid "Intrinsic operator '%s' referenced at %L not found in module '%s'" de.po-msgid "The equivalence set for variable '%s' declared at %L violates alignment requirents" tr.po-msgid "Processing spec %c%s%c, which is '%s'\n" tr.po:msgstr "'%4$s' %1$c%2$s%3$c ozelligi isleniyor\n" ^ This could be a challenge! tr.po-msgid "%s: warning: using formals list from %s(%d) for function '%s'\n" tr.po-msgid "collect: tweaking %s in %s\n" zh_TW.po-msgid "Assumed size array '%s' in namelist '%s'at %C is not allowed." zh_TW.po-msgid "Assumed shape array '%s' in namelist '%s' at %C is an extension." zh_TW.po-msgid "Argument '%s' of pure function '%s' at %L must be INTENT(IN)" (Reminder to self: test also "%s does not support %%n$ operand number formats".) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29711
