------- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 20:10 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > With the introduction of the new loop unroller in 4.0, > I think you mean 3.4.0 because the new unroller was in 3.4.0. >
You're right, it was introduced then. Although the old loop unroller was still present in 3.4.0 and could be selected with a flag - which was useful to get avoid performance regressions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29946
