------- Comment #19 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-03 19:41 ------- Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
Tobias, > Note that this does not fix everything as gfortran rejects also > interface_y.f90 > if I comment the "call bl_copy(1.0, chr)"; if I understand the standard > correctly, the ambiguity is ok as long as one does not try to access bl_copy. > (And ifort/NAG f95 and sunf95 agree with me.) > Do you think that the error in gfortran.dg/interface_1.f90 is correct? I have fix for the above that also stops the doubling of the error message. However, it breaks interface_1.f90 because there is no refernce to the generic interface 'ambiguous' and so, no error. Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
