------- Comment #7 from rhaschke at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-12-08 08:08 ------- You are right. The return type of STATE and the actual methods differ. Actually they should have the same type, i.e.:
typedef BaseRobot::STATE (BaseRobot::*STATE)(int); STATE ready (int); ... Because the recursive type definition for STATE is not supported, I need the detour using PseudoState. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30108
