------- Comment #4 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-12-16 19:28 ------- Steve posted his fix at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01012.html and I came up with an improved version that correctly identifies the equivalence of "z" and "z(:)" here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01094.html
Sorry for the inconvenience. It looks like I introduced this regression whilst restructuring gfc_dep_resolver. As penance, I'm currently investigating a related gfortran optimization, that can use the proposed gfc_full_array_ref_p, to improve the code generated for your POSL function even further. -- roger at eyesopen dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roger at eyesopen dot com Keywords| |patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30207