------- Comment #3 from s__nakayama at infoseek dot jp 2006-12-22 08:39 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> When is the justification that we expect a value of 2? Bool in C++ is
> a one-bit type and when you do x.x++ I would imagine that you overflow
> the range of that type. The fact that you declare it as a bit-field of
> length 4 is immaterial, in my opinion: you also don't get a 128-bit integer
> simply by declaring a variable as
> struct X {
> int x : 128;
> };
It is a result of g++4.2 not a expectation that a value becomes 2.
Bit-size is immaterial.
The problem is that std 5.3.2 isn't applied for bit-field.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30274
