------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 16:08 -------
Note,  above the first FORALL statement one needs to add
the following 2 lines of code

xmin = 0.
xmax = 1.

As a side note, both Pathscale and Intel in the c.l.f thread have
acknowledged that their compilers also miss this optimization.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409

Reply via email to