------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 16:08 ------- Note, above the first FORALL statement one needs to add the following 2 lines of code
xmin = 0. xmax = 1. As a side note, both Pathscale and Intel in the c.l.f thread have acknowledged that their compilers also miss this optimization. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409