------- Comment #19 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 17:04 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Well then please accept my humble apology. No intent to disparage. I was > attempting to concur with Kaveh's suggestion in Comment #13 that ""WONTFIX" > may > be a more accurate description if that is the group decision." I should have > chosen better wording or simply remained silent.
Apology accepted. IMHO a key part of my sentence you quote that you ignored in practice was "group decision". Two other gcc developer's (Eric and David) have signed up because they also care about this bug. Let's hold off on "WONTFIX" until the 4.0 branch is closed for good. Then we can eliminate 4.0-only bugs en-masse as I'm sure many remain. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399
