------- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-07 09:24 ------- Subject: Re: recursive I/O hangs under OSX 10.3
> Section 9.5.3.7.1, paragarph 2, defines a "child I/O statement" as one that's > occuring within a user-defined derived-type I/O function -- which is > definitely > not applicable here. Could you please translate this in plain English? I have looked at the standard draft and have been unable to figure out a single conforming example, not speaking about a single useful one. If someone can give me such example(s), I am ready to test it (them) on both OSX and Linux. >From the above quotation, am I correct to infer that replacing * by 6 will not make the code standard conforming? TIA -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
