------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-07 19:10 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If you find something that works without that argument (which is > a bit of a kudge), so much the better.
The patch I attached removes this argument, and it gives no regression on the testsuite. I also simplified the conditional expression by using a COND_EXPR instead of generating different blocks. Would you mind looking at it to see if you spot anything odd? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30720
