------- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 20:26 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The problem was supposed to have been fixed: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-02/msg00194.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-02/msg00172.html
Ah, I see. As I don't regularly read gcc-cvs :-), and the commits didn't mention this PR, I didn't catch that. This WORKSFORME now. Is anybody else seeing problems? If not, we can close this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30678
