------- Comment #29 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-12 01:15 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
> ------- Comment #27 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 01:03 ------- > (In reply to comment #6) > > Fortran is not release-critical and this bug appears to be purely within the > > Fortran front end. > > Should I commit the patch for the next release candidate once the branch is > unfrozen? Personally, I don't believe this a sufficiently important bug > (being > an ICE on weird invalid code designed deliberately to break the compiler), but > if you don't want this regression in the release, I'll happily commit it in > time for the next release candidate. Mark always says that if it's not c++ ;) Since it's a regression, I believe it's your call. The test could be xfail'd if you decide the benefits aren't worth the risk. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30478
