------- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-02-12 14:23 -------
I'm testing the patch below. (wasn;t able to reproduce the problem in the
attched testcase, but here's a reduced testcase for the problem that Richi
described - thanks!:

int a[128];
int
main()
{
  short i;

  for (i=0; i<64; i++){
    a[i] = (int)i;
  }
  return 0;
}

)

Index: tree-vect-analyze.c
===================================================================
--- tree-vect-analyze.c (revision 121843)
+++ tree-vect-analyze.c (working copy)
@@ -97,8 +97,12 @@
   int nbbs = loop->num_nodes;
   block_stmt_iterator si;
   unsigned int vectorization_factor = 0;
+  tree scalar_type;
+  tree phi;
+  tree vectype;
+  unsigned int nunits;
+  stmt_vec_info stmt_info;
   int i;
-  tree scalar_type;

   if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
     fprintf (vect_dump, "=== vect_determine_vectorization_factor ===");
@@ -107,12 +111,67 @@
     {
       basic_block bb = bbs[i];

+      for (phi = phi_nodes (bb); phi; phi = PHI_CHAIN (phi))
+       {
+         stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (phi);
+         if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
+           {
+             fprintf (vect_dump, "==> examining phi: ");
+             print_generic_expr (vect_dump, phi, TDF_SLIM);
+           }
+
+         gcc_assert (stmt_info);
+
+         /* Two cases of "relevant" phis: those that define an 
+            induction that is used in the loop, and those that
+            define a reduction.  */
+         if ((STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT (stmt_info) == vect_used_in_loop
+              && STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info) == vect_induction_def)
+             || (STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT (stmt_info) == vect_used_by_reduction
+                 && STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info) == vect_reduction_def))
+            {
+             gcc_assert (!STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info));
+              scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (PHI_RESULT (phi));
+
+             if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
+               {
+                 fprintf (vect_dump, "get vectype for scalar type:  ");
+                 print_generic_expr (vect_dump, scalar_type, TDF_SLIM);
+               }
+
+             vectype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (scalar_type);
+             if (!vectype)
+               {
+                 if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_UNVECTORIZED_LOOPS))
+                   {
+                     fprintf (vect_dump,
+                              "not vectorized: unsupported data-type ");
+                     print_generic_expr (vect_dump, scalar_type, TDF_SLIM);
+                   }
+                 return false;
+               }
+             STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info) = vectype;
+
+             if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
+               {
+                 fprintf (vect_dump, "vectype: ");
+                 print_generic_expr (vect_dump, vectype, TDF_SLIM);
+               }
+
+             nunits = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype);
+             if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
+               fprintf (vect_dump, "nunits = %d", nunits);
+
+             if (!vectorization_factor
+                 || (nunits > vectorization_factor))
+               vectorization_factor = nunits;
+           }
+       }
+
       for (si = bsi_start (bb); !bsi_end_p (si); bsi_next (&si))
         {
          tree stmt = bsi_stmt (si);
-         unsigned int nunits;
-         stmt_vec_info stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (stmt);
-         tree vectype;
+         stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (stmt);

          if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
            {
@@ -269,10 +328,11 @@
            return false;
          }

-         if (STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT_P (stmt_info))
+         if (STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT (stmt_info) == vect_used_in_loop
+             && STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info) != vect_induction_def)
            {
              /* Most likely a reduction-like computation that is used
-                in the loop.  */
+                in the loop.  */
              if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_UNVECTORIZED_LOOPS))
                fprintf (vect_dump, "not vectorized: unsupported pattern.");
             return false;
@@ -2235,17 +2295,7 @@

         (case 2)
            If STMT has been identified as defining a reduction variable, then
-          we have two cases:
-          (case 2.1)
-            The last use of STMT is the reduction-variable, which is defined
-            by a loop-header-phi. We don't want to mark the phi as live or
-            relevant (because it does not need to be vectorized, it is handled
-             as part of the vectorization of the reduction), so in this case
we
-            skip the call to vect_mark_relevant.
-          (case 2.2)
-            The rest of the uses of STMT are defined in the loop body. For
-             the def_stmt of these uses we want to set liveness/relevance
-             as follows:
+           we want to set liveness/relevance as follows:
                STMT_VINFO_LIVE_P (DEF_STMT_info) <-- false
                STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT (DEF_STMT_info) <-- vect_used_by_reduction
              because even though STMT is classified as live (since it defines
a
@@ -2297,16 +2347,6 @@
          bb = bb_for_stmt (def_stmt);
          if (!flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, bb))
            continue;
-
-         /* case 2.1: the reduction-use does not mark the defining-phi
-            as relevant.  */
-         if (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_vinfo) == vect_reduction_def
-             && TREE_CODE (def_stmt) == PHI_NODE)
-           continue;
-
-         if (dt == vect_induction_def && TREE_CODE (def_stmt) == PHI_NODE)
-           continue;
-
          vect_mark_relevant (&worklist, def_stmt, relevant, live_p);
        }
     }                          /* while worklist */


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30771

Reply via email to