------- Comment #50 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-12 17:09 -------
> > I really think CP2K should be added to some nightly > > tester somewhere by gfortran developers... > > Well, I second that, but we first need to get it working (like, the middle-end > people have to move on PR30391). > I agree that are two separate issues. One is to get it to work (and keep it that way), and the other would be to monitor runtime performance. For the latter issue I can prepare reasonable benchmark inputs, while for the former I think it is good enough to just compile the tarbal from the initial comment. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
