------- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-17 22:42 ------- This works and regtests OK:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c =================================================================== *** gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 121864) --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy) *************** resolve_fl_var_and_proc (gfc_symbol *sym *** 5529,5534 **** --- 5529,5549 ---- } + static gfc_component * + has_default_initializer (gfc_symbol *der) + { + gfc_component *c; + for (c = der->components; c; c = c->next) + if ((c->ts.type != BT_DERIVED && c->initializer) + || (c->ts.type == BT_DERIVED + && !c->pointer + && has_default_initializer (c->ts.derived))) + break; + + return c; + } + + /* Resolve symbols with flavor variable. */ static try *************** resolve_fl_variable (gfc_symbol *sym, in *** 5676,5684 **** components. */ c = NULL; if (sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && !(sym->value || flag)) ! for (c = sym->ts.derived->components; c; c = c->next) ! if (c->initializer) ! break; /* 4th constraint in section 11.3: "If an object of a type for which component-initialization is specified (R429) appears in the --- 5691,5697 ---- components. */ c = NULL; if (sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && !(sym->value || flag)) ! c = has_default_initializer (sym->ts.derived); /* 4th constraint in section 11.3: "If an object of a type for which component-initialization is specified (R429) appears in the I need to think about it - it looks a bit clumsy to me and I need also to think through compliance with the standard. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30660