------- Comment #7 from filippo dot arcidiacono at gmail dot com 2007-02-26 13:01 ------- > is wrong, it should be instead: > mov #1, r1
OK! This is what I get if I use __builtin_nanf() instead of nanf. But using nanf there isn't any undefined nanf symbol in the obiect generated, as expected, as well as happens also with gcc (3.4.3). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30936
