------- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 05:50 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This makes minloc have rank 0, and allows for > inlining.
No, it's wrong. See F95 13.14.71: "Result Characteristics. The result is of type default integer. If DIM is absent, the result is an array of rank one and of size equal to the rank of ARRAY; otherwise, the result is of rank n-1 and shape ..." Note in particular the example for case (i), on the next page: "The value of MINLOC((/4,3,6,3/)) is [2]". If DIM is absent, the result is always an array of rank 1. Only if DIM is present, and the ARRAY is of rank 1, then MINLOC is a scalar: MINLOC((/4,3,6,3/),1) == 2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067
