------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 17:39 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > See also PR 23281 [snip] > Consequently I'm filing this as a DR against the gcc DR reporting machinery > itself, rather than against the compiler in particular. There needs to be > categories for QOI defects of varying severity; either that, or complaints > about > diagnostics and other QOI ussues should not by policy be filed as "enhancement > requests", and forgotten.
It doesn't matter whether this is filled this way or that way. The problem is that there are more tan 2 thousand bugs opened. Logically, most developers tend to focus on fixing regressions, ICEs or optimisations rather on precise wording of correct diagnostics. We need more contributors in this area, you are welcome to participate! -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23263