------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 17:48 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > It is, however, at least unspecified order of evaluation and a warning > here would still make sense. >
A candidate for -Wsequence-points ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24016
