------- Comment #9 from roberto dot gordo at gmail dot com  2007-03-17 17:58 
-------
I would like to apologize for my faults in gcc bug report 31166, specially to
the people who responded, and fully acknowledge my error. I've misunderstood
your responses. Now, while reading them again, they appear completely logical
to me.

I was working during hours with a piece of code on which I've been bitten by
lots of c language weirdness. I've discovered and fixed most of them (except
the reported one), but after so many consecutive hours of debugging such ugly
code my mind was not in a very clear state... and my comments were fairly
stupid, I must admit. I'm sorry for that.

There is still something remaining that I don't fully understand (the
integer/unsigned promotion thing). I'm still wondering about that, but I accept
your responses, so I think I'm somewhat not giving the right interpretation at
the standard wordings. I will try to find the cause on mailing lists or other
places, since the gcc bugzilla may not be the correct place.

Thanks for your patience and please accept my apologies for wasting your time.
Sorry.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31166

Reply via email to