------- Comment #41 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 17:30 ------- Created an attachment (id=13302) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13302&action=view) alternate patch
I'm inclined to take this approach to the problem. Note that the result range we get from this is [1,+INF] instead of [0,+INF], which is in fact more correct as far as it goes. Bootstrapping it now... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31169
