------- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 20:27 -------
Adding this to TRANSFER meta-bug, as frame 3 in the backtrace indicates a
relation. No confirmation as I can not tell whether it is a dupe or not.
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x86e4fec "../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c",
line=4472, function=0x86e54c7 "gfc_conv_expr_descriptor")
at ../../../gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:656
#1 0x080baf5c in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor (se=0xbfa27ad4, expr=0x8894850,
ss=0x8895b80) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:4472
#2 0x080bc19f in gfc_conv_array_parameter (se=0xbfa27ad4, expr=0x8894850,
ss=0x8895b80, g77=1) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:4786
#3 0x080d68fa in gfc_conv_intrinsic_transfer (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894770)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:3111
#4 0x080cc3c2 in gfc_conv_function_expr (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894850)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:2689
#5 0x080cc8e9 in gfc_conv_expr (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894770)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3129
#6 0x080ce928 in gfc_trans_assignment (expr1=0x8894270, expr2=0x8894770,
init_flag=0 '\0') at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3823
#7 0x080cf131 in gfc_trans_assign (code=0x8895af8)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3985
#8 0x080b07dd in gfc_trans_code (code=0x8895af8)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans.c:473
#9 0x080c7d06 in gfc_generate_function_code (ns=0x885a1e8)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:3217
#10 0x0808c2b4 in gfc_parse_file () at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.c:3261
#11 0x080ab660 in gfc_be_parse_file (set_yydebug=0)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:305
#12 0x0830042d in toplev_main (argc=4, argv=0xbfa284c4)
at ../../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1050
#13 0x080ed162 in main (argc=2, argv=0x6) at ../../../gcc/gcc/main.c:35
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |31237
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
