------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-04-08 00:58 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do you mean -Woverloaded-virtual? (see man page)
> The diagostic reports when a derived class's method 'hides' the base class's.
>
No, he simply wants to know that "it doesn't matter from a semantic point,
but just to make the declaration clearer, why don't you add a 'virtual'
to your destructor and int f(int) functions, because they are implicitly
virtual anyway'.
Confirmed.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-08 00:58:22
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31397
