------- Comment #46 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-04-13 08:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 only] Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs past EOF
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #45 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 05:32 > ------- > (In reply to comment #44) >> sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K started to fail on Mar. 19: > And then start passing and then again started to fail again on/around April > 1st. HJL when will you please get your dates correct. > > Now I am confused because I reverted and re-patched and it was tested by spark and sixtrack was then fine. I specifically had this tested before committing the last fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
