------- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 20:08 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > It appears that spurious ICE messages are a general problem with GCC. > > Well, it's true that an ICE on invalid code *and* after a sensible error > message has been emitted does not have too large an impact for users. > > I can reproduce the ICE on minw32, but when I run f951 directly (instead of > letting the driver calling it) it doesn't ICE (even with the same options as > the driver passes to it). So, I can post a backtrace nor investigate :(
I'm guessing that f951 exits with a non-zero exit status, and the driver catches that. > -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519