------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 07:38 ------- foo1 (__result, n) { bar1 ((int4 *) n, foo1); goto __return_foo1; __return_foo1:;
looks strange. Shouldn't this be: bar1 ((int4 *) n, __result) In addition, the warning g.f90:8: warning: Function does not return a value should be suppressed. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-25 07:38:17 date| | Summary|function without result |Wrong code when passing |clause fails to compile |function name as result to |prperly |procedures http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31692