------- Comment #3 from ghood at psc dot edu 2007-05-09 19:04 -------
OK, I now understand the issue here. The fact that B and C were not
explicitly templatized, and the other compilers accepted it, led me
to think that it was valid code. In case anyone else is interested,
there's an explanation at:
http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#base-lookup
Thanks.
--
ghood at psc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31881
