------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 13:39 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I misunderstood something slightly in that last comment; MERGE is elemental, > so > the conforming I mentioned doesn't matter. Also, my guess that fixing the > transfer("A", "x", 20) problem would fix the whole thing proved to be > incorrect.
See comment #6. > So, even once the first bit is fixed, if we change the code to be legitimate, > as follows, then it still has an error: > character(len=20) :: string > logical :: a(20) > write(*,*) transfer (merge (transfer("A", "x", 20), "b", a), string ) > end It also fails with a character(len = 1) array of size 20. > Specifically, we ICE by failing the "gcc_assert (integer_zerop (loop -> > from[n]))" at line 593 of trans-array.c, when doing gfc_conv... stuff to the > arguments of the outer transfer function. > I'm having a bear of a time tracking down why this is happening. The problem > is that we're generating a temporary, so loop->temp_dim is 1 (as set in > gfc_trans_constant_array_constructor, line 1576). However, the loop seems to > be picking up dimensions from the result of the inner transfer function > somehow. Walking through the ss list for the loop gives a GFC_SS_CONSTRUCTOR, > a GFC_SS_SCALAR, and a GFC_SS_SECTION, and the GFC_SS_SECTION causes the > info->start[0] and info->end[0] values to be set (to 1 and 20, respectively) > in > gfc_conv_ss_startstride, which then propagate to the from[0] and to[0] values > for the loop. > I can't seem to duplicate this with any other set of functions. It's only > happening with characters, not integers, and if I break up the expression or > substitute other things for transfer and merge, it doesn't replicate this > behavior. > Help? I'll have a think about this tonight. I NEVER find debugging the scalarizer easy; not in small part because I have to re-understand it every time I go near it. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31610