------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-30 21:35 ------- > a and c are actually a little more accurate at the end. > Its also interesting that this deviation between the methods > appears to happen only near the end of the sequence. > I have visually scanned in quite a few places and all three are > identical until this point.
What I expect is: below 16384s ~4.5 hours, all the results are equal almost all the time, below 32768s ~9 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~1 ms, below 65536s ~18 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~2ms, and for the following ~6 hours, all the results are equal +/- ~4ms (~spacing(65536.0)/2.0). Does it fit with what you saw? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32057
